Radiologic Features of Injuries From the Boston Marathon Bombing at Three Hospitals
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study is to describe the radiologic imaging findings of primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary blast injuries in patients injured in the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15, 2013.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 43 patients presenting to three acute care hospitals and undergoing radiologic investigation within 7 hours of the time of the bombing on April 15, 2013, were included in this study. The radiographic and CT features of these patients were evaluated for imaging findings consistent with primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary blast injury.
RESULTS. There were no pulmonary or gastrointestinal manifestations of the primary blast wave on imaging. Secondary blast injuries identified on imaging included a total of 189 shrapnel fragments identified in 32 of the 43 patients. The shrapnel was identified most often in the soft tissues of the leg (36.5%), thigh (31.2%), and pelvis (13.2%). Imaging identified 125 ball bearings, 10 nails, one screw, 44 metal fragments, and nine other (gravel, glass, etc.) foreign bodies.
CONCLUSION. Injuries from the Boston Marathon bombing were predominantly from the secondary blast wave and resulted in traumatic injuries predominantly of the lower extremities. The most common shrapnel found on radiologic evaluation was the ball bearing.
The Boston Marathon bombing occurred on April 15, 2013, at approximately 2:49 pm and involved the use of two pressure-cooker bombs, killing three people and injuring more than 260 others. Survivors were treated among 27 local hospitals; however, the most severely injured patients were treated at the level 1 trauma centers in Boston. In all, Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Brig ham and Women's Faulkner Hospital treated more than 90 patients [1–3].
Blast injuries are commonly described as primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary. Primary blast injuries are due to the effects of an overpressure wave and are most severe with high-order explosives. Secondary blast injuries are due to flying debris and are the most common blast injuries. Tertiary blast injuries are due to falling or being thrown back from the force of the blast. Quaternary blast injuries are due to fire, chemicals, biologic agents, or radioactive substances.
Because the explosive devices were of relatively low power and positioned on the ground, lower extremity injuries were the most common, with at least 16 patients requiring limb amputations. Most injuries from open-air bomb blasts result from penetrating trauma caused by shrapnel fragments released during the blast [4], and in the Boston Marathon bombing victims, the major injuries were caused by shrapnel, which included nails, ball bearing, screws and pressure-cooker fragments. Radiology played an important role in the management and triage of these patients [3]. The aim of this study is to describe the radiologic imaging findings of primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary blast injuries of patients injured in the Boston Marathon bombing.
Materials and Methods
A total of 43 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) and underwent radiologic investigation within 7 hours of the time of the initial explosion on April 15, 2013, were included in this study. These 43 patients evaluated were from Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital. Institutional review board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent for the retrospective medical record review. Several critically injured patients who were transported directly to the operating theater from the ED resuscitation bay without undergoing initial imaging evaluation within 7 hours of the blast were excluded from the study. Patients who did not undergo any radiologic investigation were also not included in the study.
The radiographic and CT features of these patients were evaluated for imaging findings of primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary blast injury. The primary blast injuries included ear, lung, and bowel injuries caused by high-pressure blast wave. The presence of shrapnel was considered diagnostic of secondary blast wave. The presence of fractures without any evidence of soft-tissue breech and shrapnel were considered features of tertiary blast wave. Burn injuries and toxic gas inhalation were considered features of quaternary blast wave. The radiographic and CT images were evaluated for the following: presence of shrapnel; number of shrapnel; penetration of pleural or peritoneal surface; presence of soft-tissue or osseous injury; type of shrapnel (ball bearing, nail, screw, metal fragment from casing, etc.); and fractures.
Results
The age of the patients ranged from 19 to 65 years (mean, 37.1 years) in the 43 patients included in this study. There were 21 men and 22 women in the study group. Seven patients presented within 60 minutes of the blast for the radiologic assessment, and 22 patients presented between 60 and 120 minutes. Nine patients presented between 2 and 3 hours, and another five presented 3–7 hours after the blast. The first patient imaged in radiology was 28 minutes from the time of the blast.
Abdomen and pelvis CT studies were performed in 13 patients. Chest CT studies were performed in two patients. Cross-sectional imaging of the head was performed in 10 patients, most often with CT (n = 9). Four patients underwent a cervical spine CT study. All 43 patients underwent radiographic evaluation.
Primary Blast Wave
There were no cases of blast lung injury or bowel perforation in the study group. Tympanic membrane perforation was present in 14 patients. Six of those patients in the study group subsequently underwent amputation of an extremity.
Secondary Blast Wave
Shrapnel fragments were identified on imaging in 32 of the 43 patients. In these 32 patients, the number of foreign bodies varied from one to 41, with a total of 189 shrapnel fragments identified in the study group (Figs. 1–6). No radiopaque foreign body was identified in the other 11 patients. The shrapnel fragments were identified most often in the leg (36.5%), thigh (31.2%), and pelvis (13.2%) soft tissues, with the remaining 19.0% located above the pelvis or in the foot. Soft tissues of leg, thigh, and pelvis accounted for 153 (81.0%) of the 189 shrapnel fragments (Table 1). There were 125 ball bearings, 10 nails, one screw, 44 metal fragments, and nine other (gravel, glass, etc.) foreign bodies identified on imaging. None of the shrapnel penetrated the pleural or peritoneal space (Table 2).
Anatomic Location of Shrapnel | Shrapnel Fragments |
---|---|
Foot | 10 (5.3) |
Leg | 69 (36.5) |
Thigh | 59 (31.2) |
Pelvis | 25 (13.2) |
Abdomen | 2 (1.1) |
Chest | 2 (1.1) |
Neck | 5(2.6) |
Head | 9(4.8) |
Forearm | 5(2.6) |
Hand | 3(1.5) |
Total | 189 |
Note—Data are expressed as number (percentage).
Type of Shrapnel | Shrapnel Fragments |
---|---|
Metal fragment | 44 (23.3) |
Ball bearing | 125 (66.1) |
Nail | 10 (5.3) |
Screw | 1 (0.5) |
Others | 9(4.8) |
Total | 189 |
Note—Data are expressed as number (percentage).
Fractures were seen in 11 patients and included foot, leg, thigh, hand, orbit, nose, and lumbar spinal fractures. All fractures except a lumbar transverse process, tibial, and nasal bone fractures were categorized as secondary blast injuries.
Tertiary and Quaternary Blast Wave
The right-sided lumbar transverse process and nasal bone fractures seen in two patients in the study group were categorized as tertiary blast injuries. A fracture of the tibial shaft in a different patient, without any associated shrapnel or skin breech, was categorized as a tertiary blast injury (Fig. 7).
Seven patients had burn injuries. None of the patients exhibited signs of inhalation of toxic gases. These were classified as injuries from quaternary blast wave.
Discussion
Blast injuries have the potential to cause soft tissue as well as osseous injuries from the blast wave, shrapnel fragments, and blast wind [4–8]. Primary blast injury is caused by a blast wave produced by the explosion and has the potential to cause injuries to the air-containing cavities, such as ear, lungs, and abdominal hollow viscera. The tissue damage in the lungs is caused by the pressure difference at the air-tissue interface, leading to pulmonary contusion, hemothorax, pneumothorax, traumatic emphysema, bronchopleural fistula, air embolism, and arteriovenous fistulas. The positive-pressure wave, which lasts 5–10 ms, can damage the tympanic membrane at relatively lower pressures of 5–15 pounds per square inch. Damage to the lungs and bowel loops requires relatively higher pressures of 40–75 pounds per square inch [6]. Because the colon contains the most air in the abdomen, colonic perforations are the most common site of bowel perforation. In our study, we did not encounter any pulmonary or bowel injury from the primary blast wave. The likely reason for the lack of pulmonary and bowel injury is believed to be the open space where the explosion occurred and the relatively smaller intensity of the blast as compared with high-explosive ordnance seen with improvised explosive devices in other parts of the world. There were 11 tympanic membrane perforations, 10 of which were believed to be related to the primary blast wave and one related to shrapnel. The tympanic membrane perforation rate of 32.5% (14/43) is comparable to 30.7% (1223/3981) prevalence rate for blast-related ear injuries among U.S. military personnel during Operation Iraqi Freedom [7]. The tympanic membrane perforation rates have been variously reported to range from 9% to 47% in different studies [7–10].
Secondary blast injury is caused by shrapnel fragments traveling at a high speed, secondary to the explosion. These penetrating injuries are the most common cause of explosion-related injury [11]. The radiologic evaluation of secondary blast injury involves identification of the shrapnel fragments and the associated soft-tissue injury caused by the penetrating force. Tertiary blast injuries are caused when victims are thrown by the force of the blast wind. These injuries are typically blunt traumatic injuries and often manifested as fractures. Quaternary blast injuries include burns, crush injuries, toxic fume inhalation, and posttraumatic stress disorder.
Because the explosive devices were left on the ground, lower extremity injuries were the most common, with five patients in our study group requiring lower limb amputations as a result of their injuries. Shrapnel fragments in the leg and thigh were identified in 36.5% and 31.2% of the patients, respectively. Shrapnel in the pelvis, thigh, leg, and foot accounted for approximately 86.2% of the total shrapnel count. This injury distribution is different from the retrospective cohort study of explosion injuries documented in the Israeli National Trauma Registry, in which the majority of patients had head and brain injuries [12]. In the same study, the most common site of internal injury was chest, followed by abdomen. However, the study of blast injury survivors in Pakistan, Lebanon, and Afghanistan showed a predilection for extremity injuries [13–15]. The location of the injuries after bomb blast is likely dependent on the height at which the bomb is placed, the incendiary nature of the accelerant, and the matériel packaged inside the improvised explosive device.
Because of the lower intensity of the blast injury at the Boston Marathon, the shrapnel fragments did not penetrate the pleural or peritoneal space. The lack of bowel or solid visceral injuries in the study group is different from the study by Bala et al. [16] from Israel, where bowel injury was seen in 85.7% of the terror-related blast victims.
The majority of the injuries in the study cohort were secondary blast injuries, caused by shrapnel, which most commonly were ball bearings (66.1%) and metal fragments (23.3%). These metal fragments are believed to be primarily from the pressure-cooker casing of the bomb. This is consistent with what is reported in the literature [7].
A potential bias in this study was the absence of more critically injured patients from the study group, who were taken to the operating room without initial radiologic evaluation. It is likely that a disproportionate number of these patients had secondary blast injuries leading to limb amputations, which were clinically obvious and therefore did not require initial imaging. We also did not include any patients who had minor injuries and did not require any imaging. It is very likely that those patients who presented with limbs missing would have had additional fragments in their injured limbs. It is doubtful that the limb loss seen at the Boston Marathon bombing was secondary to a primary blast injury but more likely was because of fragmentation.
The extensive use of radiologic investigations in the patients from the Boston Marathon bombing reaffirms its role in the evaluation of foreign bodies and skeletal trauma. Although the primary blast injuries were confined to the ear, the most common radiographically apparent injury was from shrapnel (most often ball bearings) lodged in the lower half of the body. The radiologic evaluation with radiography and contrast-enhanced CT played an integral part in the diagnostic assessment of the blast injury and played a critical role in achieving the most optimal management of the stable patients.
References
1.
Walls RM, Zinner MJ. The Boston Marathon response: why did it work so well? JAMA 2013; 309:2441–2442
2.
Biddinger PD, Baggish A, Harrington L, et al. Be prepared: the Boston Marathon and mass-casualty events. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1958–1960
3.
Guermazi A, Hayashi D, Smith SE, Palmer W, Katz JN. Imaging of blast injuries to the lower extremities sustained in the Boston Marathon bombing. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 201; 65:1893–1898
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Blast injuries: fact sheets for professionals. www.bt.cdc.gov/masscasualties/pdf/blast_fact_sheet_professionals-a.pdf. Accessed on April 21, 2014
5.
Singleton JA, Gibb IE, Bull AM, Mahoney PF, Clasper JC. Primary blast lung injury prevalence and fatal injuries from explosions: insights from postmortem computed tomographic analysis of 121 improvised explosive device fatalities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 75(suppl 2):S269–S274
6.
Yeh DD, Schecter WP. Primary blast injuries: an updated concise review. World J Surg 2012; 36:966–972
7.
Wightman JM, Gladish SL. Explosions and blast injuries. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37:664–678
8.
Ritenour AE, Baskin TW. Primary blast injury: update on diagnosis and treatment. Crit Care Med 2008; 36(suppl):S311–S317
9.
Dougherty AL, MacGregor AJ, Han PP, Viirre E, Heltemes KJ, Galarneau MR. Blast-related ear injuries among U.S. military personnel. J Rehabil Res Dev 2013; 50:893–904
10.
Walsh RM, Pracy JP, Huggon AM, Gleeson MJ. Bomb blast injuries to the ear: the London Bridge incident series. J Accid Emerg Med 1995; 12:194–198
11.
Eskridge SL, Macera CA, Galarneau MR, et al. Injuries from combat explosions in Iraq: injury type, location, and severity. Injury 2012; 43:1678–1682
12.
Peleg K, Aharonson-Daniel L, Stein M, et al.; Israeli Trauma Group (ITG). Gunshot and explosion injuries: characteristics, outcomes, and implications for care of terror-related injuries in Israel. Ann Surg 2004; 239:311–318
13.
Mirza FH, Parhyar HA, Tirmizi SZ. Rising threat of terrorist bomb blasts in Karachi: a 5-year study. J Forensic Leg Med 2013; 20:747–751
14.
Singleton JA, Gibb IE, Hunt NC, Bull AM, Clasper JC. Identifying future ‘nexpected’ survivors: a retrospective cohort study of fatal injury patterns in victims of improvised explosive devices. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e003130
15.
Haddad MC, Khoury NJ, Hourani MH. Radiology of terror injuries: the American University of Beirut Medical Center experience. Clin Imaging 2008; 32:83–87
16.
Bala M, Rivkind AI, Zamir G, et al. Abdominal trauma after terrorist bombing attacks exhibits a unique pattern of injury. Ann Surg 2008; 248:303–309
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© American Roentgen Ray Society.
History
Submitted: January 12, 2014
Accepted: February 8, 2014
First published: July 23, 2014
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
To download the citation to this article, select your reference manager software.